Reply-To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net>
To: "Adrian Apollo" <thinkonaut@yahoo.com>
Cc: "KR-language" <KR-language@YahooGroups.com>,
	"OWL at W3C" <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>,
	"semantic-web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3c.org>
References: <20051014070137.47702.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: OWL capabilities
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:45:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670

No. 
OWL has no
    context (but they're close)
    questions (they have separate languages)
    commands/methods
    n-ary relations 
    iterations
    conditionals (they have separate languages/tools)

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://rhm.cdepot.net/
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Adrian Apollo 
  To: Richard H. McCullough 
  Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:01 AM
  Subject: Re: Fw: genus-differential definitions in OWL and MKR


  Can OWL do everything that MKR can do, except messier?