# 1999/3/1 #====================# # Axiomatic Concepts # #====================# 1. Ayn Rand states (ITOE, Chapter 6) An axiomatic concept is the identifification of a primary fact of reality, which cannot be analyzed, i.e., reduced to other facts or broken into component parts. It is implicit in all facts and in all knowledge. It is the fundamentally given and directly perceived or experienced, which requires no proof or explanation, but on which all proofs and explanations exist. The first and primary axiomatic concepts are "existence", "identity" (which is a corollary of "existence") and "consciousness". One can study what exists and how consciousness functions; but one cannot analyze (or "prove") existence as such, or consciousness as such. These are irreducible primaries. (An attempt to "prove" them is self- contradictory: it is an attempt to "prove" existence by means of non-existence, and consciousness by means of unconsciousness.) 2. In essence, I agree with Ayn Rand. However, I think that her choice of primary axiomatic concepts obscures the issues because it omits too much of the context. My choice for primary axiomatic concepts is existent, entity, relation, man, identify, knowledge where (using KR, my knowledge representation language) existent is either entity or relation man, knowledge isa entity knowledge := man do identify existent I claim that the use of these six concepts clarifies the notion of identification -- the product, subject, action, and object -- and thus gives a clear idea of what "existence", "identity" and "consciousness" really mean. Although Rand uses these three concepts in several different senses, I think her main sense of meaning is existence is identity is existent consciousness is identify 3. There are six secondary axiomatic concepts which are too important to go unmentioned: action, space, time choose, purpose, view Action is the characterization of change; space and time are the attributes which measure change. Man chooses a purpose, which guides his choice of actions and his view of knowledge in a given context.